« Return to Thread: [Cooker] Towards a usable xulrunner
Re: [Cooker] Towards a usable xulrunner
by Tomasz Paweł Gajc
::
Rate this Message:
Dnia 2008-07-27, o godz. 11:57:48
Steve Morris <samorris@...> napisał(a):
>
> > It is safe to install xulrunner under xulrunner-x.y .
> >
> >
> Does doing this mean we will get into the ridiculous situation will
> xulrunner that we are in with libfirefox now, in that when ff is
> upgraded the libfirefox directory from previous versions has to be
> left around because other applications have a dependency on that
> version?
>
> regards,
> Steve
>This won't happen with xulrunner.
--
Regards,
TPG - MandrivaLinux's contributor
www.mandriva.com
_
( )
X ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/ \ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
Steve Morris <samorris@...> napisał(a):
>
> > It is safe to install xulrunner under xulrunner-x.y .
> >
> >
> Does doing this mean we will get into the ridiculous situation will
> xulrunner that we are in with libfirefox now, in that when ff is
> upgraded the libfirefox directory from previous versions has to be
> left around because other applications have a dependency on that
> version?
>
> regards,
> Steve
>
--
Regards,
TPG - MandrivaLinux's contributor
www.mandriva.com
_
( )
X ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/ \ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
signature.asc (204 bytes) « Return to Thread: [Cooker] Towards a usable xulrunner
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
