Hello,
Couldn't agree more.
After using Hivemind over the last 4 years in many projects, I can say I
have no wish list for feature improvements at the moment. It could use
better documentation but once you start using it , it simply works.
I really don't believe using annotations as was planned for Hivemind 2.0
would be a big improvement in the way it works, maybe quite the
opposite. So I believe this project, while no longer in active
development, is far from dead.
Regards,
- Juliano
Johan Maasing wrote:
> We use hivemind in our web portal, serving a lot of customers. So I
> would say that our organization is pretty dependent on hivemind and we
> are slowly increasing the use of hivemind to wire together frameworks,
> both web-portals, plain java applications and webservice frameworks.
> So why are we not involved in developing hivemind further?
> Because "it just works". We have no big problems with hivemind, it has
> all the features we need. The configuration and contribution-trick in
> hivemind is a killer feature, I know no way to do the same thing as
> easily in spring, guice or the others. Perhaps there is but I don't
> know how. So for us hivemind is a very nice tool that just works.
> So the hivemind project on apache might be slow and appear dead but
> that shouldn't stop you from using it. It is mature, tested in battle
> and works.
>
> Cheers,
> Johan
>
> 2008/11/18 James Carman <
james@...>:
>
>> HiveMind hasn't been in active development for quite some time.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:19 AM, fan_42 <
frank.bommeli@...> wrote:
>>
>>> I just stumbled up HiveMind.
>>>
>>> it sound interesting to me, but is it dead or is it on hold?
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-DISCUSS---REPORT--HiveMind-November-2008-tp20437346p20561587.html>>> Sent from the HiveMind - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>>
