On 08/13/2012 11:19 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>> But the last figure must be influenced somehow. As i understand the figure
>> is all translated packets through time? (but perhaps I'm wrong on this one).
>> And as packets translated before 2006 is no longer in the data set, it must
>> end up as a lower number?
> That number is just the result of a "select count(*) from table where
> language" query, so that number won't change. The numbers from before
> 2006 are from an unknown script that we don't know what it did.
> Essentially it will look like in 2006 lots of translations came out of
> nowhere, which is what happened since there was an import of the old
This is right.
We lost the db and with it all translations in 2006 and reimport the
last Translations-Files into the new system.
In the old db was all the history, the reviews, the changes...