On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:43 PM, <marius.storm-olsen@...> wrote:
> Right, no attention from us and no attention from the phonon developers, at
> least with respect for Qt 5 end-users. So, by it receiving 'attention' from
> us now by simply removing the old "fork" from the repo, it would only hurt
> the end-user, making it harder for them to migrate over to Qt 5.
What hurts the end-user is the crappy quality of qtphonon. So, if the
only way to get rid of qtphonon is having Phonon Five out by the time
Qt 5 gets out, then I guess that would be the way to go.