Hi,
I agree with this errata. That's an evil typo that I must have made
in the draft that went undetected through the reviews.
I'd recommend setting the errata as "Verified", whoever has permission
to edit that one.
/Kristofer
at den 11 april 2012 11:17, RFC Errata System wrote :
> The following errata report has been submitted for
> RFC5225, "RObust Header Compression Version 2 (ROHCv2):
> Profiles for
> RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP-Lite".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
>
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5225&eid=3185>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: FWX <
rohc_team@...>
>
> Section: page 64
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> rtp(profile_value, ts_stride_value, time_stride_value,
> reorder_ratio_value) { UNCOMPRESSED {
> ENFORCE((profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0101) ||
> (profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0107)); rtp_version =:=
> uncompressed_value(2, 0) [ 2 ];
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> rtp(profile_value, ts_stride_value, time_stride_value,
> reorder_ratio_value) { UNCOMPRESSED {
> ENFORCE((profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0101) ||
> (profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0107)); rtp_version =:=
> uncompressed_value(2, 2) [ 2 ];
>
> Notes
> -----
> rtp_version is set to 2, not to zero. See RTP Header
> Fields
> page 115 : Version This field is expected to have
> the
> value two and the field is therefore classified as
> STATIC-KNOWN.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If
> necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it
> should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if
> necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5225 (draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title : RObust Header Compression Version 2
> (ROHCv2): Profiles for RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP-Lite
> Publication Date : April 2008
> Author(s) : G. Pelletier, K. Sandlund
> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source : Robust Header Compression
> Area : Transport
> Stream : IETF
> Verifying Party : IESG
_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
Rohc@...
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc