> Hi Manolo
> Very glad to see your reply. The reason why I want to choose the gwt-platform
> was that it is more smoothly to update from current Hupa's state(gwt-presenter).
> However, I like the native one rather than gwtp since it will import the other
> resources. What I really want to do is to replace the MVP by gwt itself. I was
> just afraid whether I can complete the proposal before the deadline of GSoC, so
> I asked for you advices. If possible, I want to use the core mvp in gwt to
> realize it. Over these days, I have been researching the Hupa project and GWT
> technology and later on I want to show you something I am changing.
> To the new features, I would like to implement as many features, that a current
> email client should have, as possible not only during the GSoC period, but also
> after that. And I am also keeping my eyes open on the Hupa's JIRA, where some
> wonderful ideas come out gradually. Sure I will give my deeper discription after
> my researching. I don't think it will be late.
> Thanks a lot :)
> Wish you a happy
>> Hi Echo
>> I've been reading your application and it looks right to me.
>> One thing I see is that you have selected gwt-platform instead of the
>> core mvp in gwt but you don't say any reason about why you prefer the
>> first option.
>> Also I'd like a deeper description of how you pretend to face new
>> features, I mean components, persistence, customization etc.
>> - Manolo
Sound good. I'm not familiar with GWT and I would like to know more.
Good luck with your research and send us the findings.