the background by drawing white on top of them.
renders the entire allocated space in the main image. Using
in the background... is it not worth the trouble? Is there a better
> Angie, is there any reason to call transparent()? The other tracks render
> their background in a solid color.
>
> Lincoln
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Angie Hinrichs <
angie@...> wrote:
>
> > Mark, Do you see any error_log warnings like "ucsc_glyph: colors will
> > be out of sync ($i --> $index)!" ?
> >
> > Wherever the bad interaction is taking place, it is definitely an
> > alpha-channel problem. To construct the GD::Image using the colormap
> > and pixelmap returned by the UCSC C code,
> > Bio/Graphics/Glyph/ucsc_glyph.pm uses these calls:
> >
> > my $im = GD::Image->new($width, $height);
> > $im->transparent( <UCSC colormap's white index> );
> >
> > ... loop on UCSC colormap calls $im->colorAllocate(),
> > ** hoping that calling $im->colorAllocate() in the same order
> > results in same colormap indices
> >
> > ... loop on UCSC pixelmap calls $im->setPixel()
> >
> > ** Here is where something could go wrong. It looks like I should
> > call $im->transparent *after* the call to $im->colorAllocate() for
> > white, making sure that I pass $im's actual white index to
> > $im->transparent. However, when I call transparent after
> > colorAllocate, the white pixels are shaded light gray instead of being
> > transparent, even in the default display. Calling $im->transparent
> > first was just a hack that worked, and then I forgot about it. I will
> > try updating GD too, to see if that makes any difference.
> >
> > FWIW I am constructing the GD::Image one color and pixel at a time
> > because when I used GD::Image->newFromGdData(), the image was created
> > OK but when I returned the new $im from a sub{}, perl crashed with a
> > 'glibc detected double free or corruption'. Does that ring a bell for
> > anybody?
> >
> > Angie
> >
> > On Fri, 29 May 2009, Todd W. Harris wrote:
> >
> > > Mark -
> > >
> > > Try upgrading your GD::SVG to the most current version on CPAN.
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > >
> > > On May 29, 2009, at 9:42 AM, mark meyer wrote:
> > >
> > > > We use the GD::SVG and was never able to get the inkscape (pdf
> > generation)
> > > > operational, if that helps any.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Scott Cain <
scott@...>
> > wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Could this be a bad interaction between the plug in and GD::SVG or
> > > > inkscape (depending on what sort of hi res image you are getting)?
> > > > For example, I think that GD::SVG has a hard time with alpha channels.
> > > >
> > > > Scott
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:31 AM, mark meyer <
mmeyerposting@...>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi Angie,
> > > > >
> > > > > Bill is out of the office today, but I can try to answer your
> > questions.
> > > > > Attached are the two screen shots, one is what the plugin looks like
> > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > gbrowse, just fine as it looks in UCSC. The second is what happens
> > when
> > > > > you
> > > > > click on high-res image.
> > > > >
> > > > > We are running gbrowse v1.69. The plugin code was implemented and
> > > > > downloaded about 1 month ago, just recently ran into this issue since
> > we
> > > > > are
> > > > > trying to make some publication figures from our Gbrowse data.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can access conf files, etc. if you need to see them and try to do
> > my
> > > > > best
> > > > > to answer questions, but I may not be able to answer very detailed
> > > > > questions
> > > > > in Bill's absence since he has been the one configuring this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for checking into this for us,
> > > > >
> > > > > Mark
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Angie Hinrichs <
angie@...>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dave - yes, that sounds likely.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bill, what version of GBrowse are you running? How recently did
> > you
> > > > > > grab the plugin code? I didn't get the screenshot attachment so if
> > > > > > you wouldn't mind sending that to me, that would be helpful. If
> > your
> > > > > > GBrowse is on a public server, can you send the URL?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Angie
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 28 May 2009, Dave Clements, GMOD Help Desk wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Bill,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have no particular insight on why this is happening. My guess
> > is
> > > > > > > that it is due some obscure interaction between the UCSC plugin
> > and
> > > > > > > core GBrowse, but I don't actually know.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've CC'd Angie at UCSC to see if she may have any insight.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dave C.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Bill Pulec <
wpulec@...>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > I am attempting to view high-res images of conservation tracks
> > but
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > background of these tracks in high-res is blue. This isn't the
> > case
> > > > > > > > when
> > > > > > > > these tracks are displayed in gbrowse normally, it only happens
> > when
> > > > > > > > viewed
> > > > > > > > as high-res. Also all the non-conservation tracks are fine in
> > high
> > > > > > > > res. Is
> > > > > > > > there any reason why outputting these images in high-res would
> > do
> > > > > > > > this? Has
> > > > > > > > anyone encountered other tracks doing this in high-res? Any
> > insight
> > > > > > > > would be
> > > > > > > > appreciated. I have attached an example image of the track
> > below.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Bill
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Was this helpful? Let us know at
> > > > > > >
http://gmod.org/wiki/Help_Desk_Feedback> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Learn more about GMOD at:
> > > > > > > SMBE:
> > > > > > >
> >
http://ccg.biology.uiowa.edu/smbe/symposia.php?action=view&sym_ID=27> > > > > > > Arthropod Genomics:
> >
http://www.k-state.edu/agc/symp2009/seminar.html> > > > > > > AGA Next Gen Seq in Non-Models:
> > > > > > >
http://www.regonline.com/Nextgeneration> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC.
> > CaT
> > > > > > is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity
> > professionals.
> > > > > > Meet
> > > > > > the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity,
> > Processing, &
> > > > > > iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like
> > > > > > Barbarian
> > > > > > Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship.
> >
http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Gmod-gbrowse mailing list
> > > > > >
Gmod-gbrowse@...
> > > > > >
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmod-gbrowse> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Scott Cain, Ph. D. scott at scottcain
> > dot
> > > > net
> > > > GMOD Coordinator (
http://gmod.org/) 216-392-3087
> > > > Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
> > > >
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
> > > > is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity
> > professionals.
> > > > Meet
> > > > the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, &
> > > > iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like
> > Barbarian
> > > > Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Gmod-gbrowse mailing list
> > > >
Gmod-gbrowse@...
> > > >
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmod-gbrowse> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship.