On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 04:59:40PM +0200, Stéphane Letz wrote:
> In the proposed model, having "D-Bus code in JACK" will mean 1) only would
> be on (reservation code used in ALSA backend). Having a DBus control plugin
> would be optional, that is, it should even probably be distributed as a
> separated package.
There is no good reason for having 1) compiled-in. The initiative
to talk to PA in order to claim a device is taken by Jack. It could
just load a plugin to do this, iff configured to do it.
I'll repeat this: if dbus becomes a dependency for Jack, I will
fork Jack. And maybe introduce incompatible changes - once the
first step is taken there's little reason to avoid that, and
there are good reasons to do it. The funds to do this have been
set aside - I'd just prefer to use them for something else.
Ciao,
--
FA
Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga.
_______________________________________________
Jack-Devel mailing list
Jack-Devel@...
http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
