Re: [OGo-Users] ANNOUNCE: New ctags table

View: New views
5 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Parent Message unknown Re: [OGo-Users] ANNOUNCE: New ctags table

by Helge Hess :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Adam,

but this table is not updated in the SQL schemas of trunk?

It would be really good to have an update-1.1-to-5.5.psql in the  
Database folder.

Thanks,
   Helge

On 10.06.2009, at 20:22, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> For those building from trunk, or currently pulling packages from OBS,
> there is a new table required as of r2256.

--
Helge Hess
http://helgehess.eu/
--
OpenGroupware.org Developer
developer@...
http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer

Re: Re: New ctags table

by Adam Tauno Williams :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 12:39 +0200, Helge Hess wrote:
> Adam,
> but this table is not updated in the SQL schemas of trunk?
> It would be really good to have an update-1.1-to-5.5.psql in the  
> Database folder.

Yep, I've added that to my weekend to-do list; will add a
update-1.x-to-5.5.psql script to Database/PostgreSQL

Wondering if I shouldn't just update
Database/PostgreSQL/pg-update-schema.psql and should we bump the
table_version versions?  There is also the "object_model" table, which
as far as I can tell isn't used for anything.(?)  It would be nice if
the services would refuse to start on a non-updated database vs.
starting and then blowing up.

Planning on also fixing some of the indexing as the DB is missing some
useful indexes and has some useless ones.

> On 10.06.2009, at 20:22, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > For those building from trunk, or currently pulling packages from OBS,
> > there is a new table required as of r2256.


--
OpenGroupware.org Developer
developer@...
http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer

Re: Re: New ctags table

by Helge Hess :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On 18.06.2009, at 13:42, Adam Tauno WIlliams wrote:
> Yep, I've added that to my weekend to-do list; will add a
> update-1.x-to-5.5.psql script to Database/PostgreSQL

Thanks.

> Wondering if I shouldn't just update
> Database/PostgreSQL/pg-update-schema.psql and should we bump the
> table_version versions?

No, and yes ;-)

> There is also the "object_model" table, which
> as far as I can tell isn't used for anything.(?)

I think it isn't used. But would be quite useful (for auto-upgrades).  
It should be properly maintained if the schema is upgrade.

> It would be nice if
> the services would refuse to start on a non-updated database vs.
> starting and then blowing up.

Yes.

> Planning on also fixing some of the indexing as the DB is missing some
> useful indexes and has some useless ones.


Great.

Thanks,
   Helge
--
Helge Hess
http://helgehess.eu/
--
OpenGroupware.org Developer
developer@...
http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer

Re: Re: New ctags table

by Adam Tauno Williams :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 14:22 +0200, Helge Hess wrote:
> On 18.06.2009, at 13:42, Adam Tauno WIlliams wrote:
> > Yep, I've added that to my weekend to-do list; will add a
> > update-1.x-to-5.5.psql script to Database/PostgreSQL
> Thanks.
> > Wondering if I shouldn't just update
> > Database/PostgreSQL/pg-update-schema.psql and should we bump the
> > table_version versions?
> No,

For now I've pushed up a simple
Database/PostgreSQL/pg-update-1.x-to-5.5.psql

> and yes ;-)
> > There is also the "object_model" table, which
> > as far as I can tell isn't used for anything.(?)
> I think it isn't used. But would be quite useful (for auto-upgrades).  
> It should be properly maintained if the schema is upgrade.
> > It would be nice if
> > the services would refuse to start on a non-updated database vs.
> > starting and then blowing up.
> Yes.
> > Planning on also fixing some of the indexing as the DB is missing some
> > useful indexes and has some useless ones.
> Great.


--
OpenGroupware.org Developer
developer@...
http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer

Re: Re: New ctags table

by Helge Hess :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

just trying the new ctag support.

One issue is that a PROPFIND depth:1 on a collection (eg Calendar)  
does not return the 'self' reference (the multistatus response should  
contain the contents and one response element for the folder itself).
(there are hacks in there to make it work with Windows WebDAV I guess)

I think this results in the ZideOne plugin not making checks for ctags.

If a PROPFIND depth:0 is issued, it seems to be returned properly  
(should it be in quotes, eg "15"? not sure.).

Greets,
   Helge
--
OpenGroupware.org Developer
developer@...
http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer