|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: New ctags tableOn Thu, 2009-06-18 at 12:39 +0200, Helge Hess wrote:
> Adam, > but this table is not updated in the SQL schemas of trunk? > It would be really good to have an update-1.1-to-5.5.psql in the > Database folder. Yep, I've added that to my weekend to-do list; will add a update-1.x-to-5.5.psql script to Database/PostgreSQL Wondering if I shouldn't just update Database/PostgreSQL/pg-update-schema.psql and should we bump the table_version versions? There is also the "object_model" table, which as far as I can tell isn't used for anything.(?) It would be nice if the services would refuse to start on a non-updated database vs. starting and then blowing up. Planning on also fixing some of the indexing as the DB is missing some useful indexes and has some useless ones. > On 10.06.2009, at 20:22, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > For those building from trunk, or currently pulling packages from OBS, > > there is a new table required as of r2256. -- OpenGroupware.org Developer developer@... http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer |
|
|
Re: Re: New ctags tableOn 18.06.2009, at 13:42, Adam Tauno WIlliams wrote:
> Yep, I've added that to my weekend to-do list; will add a > update-1.x-to-5.5.psql script to Database/PostgreSQL Thanks. > Wondering if I shouldn't just update > Database/PostgreSQL/pg-update-schema.psql and should we bump the > table_version versions? No, and yes ;-) > There is also the "object_model" table, which > as far as I can tell isn't used for anything.(?) I think it isn't used. But would be quite useful (for auto-upgrades). It should be properly maintained if the schema is upgrade. > It would be nice if > the services would refuse to start on a non-updated database vs. > starting and then blowing up. Yes. > Planning on also fixing some of the indexing as the DB is missing some > useful indexes and has some useless ones. Great. Thanks, Helge -- Helge Hess http://helgehess.eu/ -- OpenGroupware.org Developer developer@... http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer |
|
|
Re: Re: New ctags tableOn Thu, 2009-06-18 at 14:22 +0200, Helge Hess wrote:
> On 18.06.2009, at 13:42, Adam Tauno WIlliams wrote: > > Yep, I've added that to my weekend to-do list; will add a > > update-1.x-to-5.5.psql script to Database/PostgreSQL > Thanks. > > Wondering if I shouldn't just update > > Database/PostgreSQL/pg-update-schema.psql and should we bump the > > table_version versions? > No, For now I've pushed up a simple Database/PostgreSQL/pg-update-1.x-to-5.5.psql > and yes ;-) > > There is also the "object_model" table, which > > as far as I can tell isn't used for anything.(?) > I think it isn't used. But would be quite useful (for auto-upgrades). > It should be properly maintained if the schema is upgrade. > > It would be nice if > > the services would refuse to start on a non-updated database vs. > > starting and then blowing up. > Yes. > > Planning on also fixing some of the indexing as the DB is missing some > > useful indexes and has some useless ones. > Great. -- OpenGroupware.org Developer developer@... http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer |
|
|
Re: Re: New ctags tableHi,
just trying the new ctag support. One issue is that a PROPFIND depth:1 on a collection (eg Calendar) does not return the 'self' reference (the multistatus response should contain the contents and one response element for the folder itself). (there are hacks in there to make it work with Windows WebDAV I guess) I think this results in the ZideOne plugin not making checks for ctags. If a PROPFIND depth:0 is issued, it seems to be returned properly (should it be in quotes, eg "15"? not sure.). Greets, Helge -- OpenGroupware.org Developer developer@... http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/developer |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |