On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Arnott <
andrewarnott@...<mailto:
andrewarnott@...>> wrote:
(Forwarding to entire list since I hit Reply instead of Reply All).
Thanks, Martin. It sounds like application/x-kvf is better than text/kvf then. Perhaps we can also be more descriptive then as say "application/x-openid-kvf"?
Andrew Arnott
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Martin Atkins <
mart@...<mailto:
mart@...>> wrote:
Andrew Arnott wrote:
> In that case, I move that we adopt text/kvf as the official Content-Type
> for Key-Value Form encoding response messages.
>
Hi Andrew,
Sorry I didn't see your messages until now.
I believe the convention for unregistered MIME types is to prefix the
subtype part with "x-", giving something like text/x-kvf.
However, since the spec mandates UTF-8 for this message format, it may
be more appropriate to use an "application/" type; text types generally
support a "charset" attribute allowing the content to be in an arbitrary
character encoding, which is not appropriate here.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list