On Nov 22, 2007 2:18 PM, Matthias Klose <
doko@...> wrote:
> Richard Guenther writes:
> >
> > It folds -C*ABS<n> to ABS<-C*n>. Anyone else thinks this function needs
> > to go? :/
> >
> > Bootstrapped & tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to mainline.
> >
> > Richard.
> >
> > 2007-11-17 Richard Guenther <
rguenther@...>
> >
> > PR middle-end/34130
> > * fold-const.c (extract_muldiv_1): Do not move negative
> > constants inside ABS_EXPR.
> >
> > * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr34130.c: New testcase.
>
> The same patch applies to the 4.2 branch as well. checked on
> sparc-linux-gnu without regressions. Ok to checkin?
>
> Currently running the testsuite on the 4.1 branch. Ok to check in on
> this branch, if the testsuite succeeds without regressions?
Ok for both.
Thanks,
Richard.
