« Return to Thread: [PATCH] account field too long but not explicit.

Re: [PATCH] account field too long but not explicit.

by Alexander Malysh :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Hi,

unfortunately patch doesn't apply cleanly:
patching file gw/smsbox.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 2142.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gw/smsbox.c.rej

Please resend...

Thanks,
Alex

Vincent CHAVANIS schrieb:

> Hi all,
>
>
> Here is a small fix that warn the user that the account field
> is too long. I've spend some time to find what's going on with this
> field and i've noticed that the field was too long.
> Also i've defined it as ACCOUNT_MAX_LEN.
>
> Any comments ?
>
> Vincent.
>
>
> --- /gateway-cvs/gw/smsbox.c    2008-06-24 14:10:36.000000000 +0200
> +++ /gateway/gw/smsbox.c        2008-09-23 11:52:07.000000000 +0200
> @@ -88,6 +88,8 @@
>
>  #define O_DESTROY(a) { if(a) octstr_destroy(a); a = NULL; }
>
> +#define ACCOUNT_MAX_LEN 32
> +
>  /* Defaults for the HTTP request queueing inside http_queue_thread */
>  #define HTTP_MAX_RETRIES    0
>  #define HTTP_RETRY_DELAY    10 /* in sec. */
> @@ -2140,11 +2142,11 @@
>      msg->sms.sms_type = mt_push;
>      msg->sms.sender = octstr_duplicate(newfrom);
>      if(octstr_len(account)) {
> -       if(octstr_len(account) <= 32 &&
> +       if(octstr_len(account) <= ACCOUNT_MAX_LEN &&
>            octstr_search_chars(account, octstr_imm("[]\n\r"), 0) == -1) {
>             msg->sms.account = account ? octstr_duplicate(account) : NULL;
>         } else {
> -           returnerror = octstr_create("Account field misformed,
> rejected");
> +           returnerror = octstr_create("Account field misformed or too
> long, rejected")
>             goto field_error;
>         }
>      }
>
>
>
>
>


 « Return to Thread: [PATCH] account field too long but not explicit.