Re: [PATCH] account field too long but not explicit.

>
> yep, i omit the ";" after the returnerror line
> due to a copy/paste error
> Fixed on this version.
>
> Vincent.
>
>
> Alexander Malysh a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> unfortunately patch doesn't apply cleanly:
>> patching file gw/smsbox.c
>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 2142.
>> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gw/smsbox.c.rej
>>
>> Please resend...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alex
>>
>> Vincent CHAVANIS schrieb:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is a small fix that warn the user that the account field
>>> is too long. I've spend some time to find what's going on with this
>>> field and i've noticed that the field was too long.
>>> Also i've defined it as ACCOUNT_MAX_LEN.
>>>
>>> Any comments ?
>>>
>>> Vincent.
>>>
>>>
>>> --- /gateway-cvs/gw/smsbox.c    2008-06-24 14:10:36.000000000 +0200
>>> +++ /gateway/gw/smsbox.c        2008-09-23 11:52:07.000000000 +0200
>>> @@ -88,6 +88,8 @@
>>>
>>>  #define O_DESTROY(a) { if(a) octstr_destroy(a); a = NULL; }
>>>
>>> +#define ACCOUNT_MAX_LEN 32
>>> +
>>>  /* Defaults for the HTTP request queueing inside http_queue_thread */
>>>  #define HTTP_MAX_RETRIES    0
>>>  #define HTTP_RETRY_DELAY    10 /* in sec. */
>>> @@ -2140,11 +2142,11 @@
>>>      msg->sms.sms_type = mt_push;
>>>      msg->sms.sender = octstr_duplicate(newfrom);
>>>      if(octstr_len(account)) {
>>> -       if(octstr_len(account) <= 32 &&
>>> +       if(octstr_len(account) <= ACCOUNT_MAX_LEN &&
>>>            octstr_search_chars(account, octstr_imm("[]\n\r"), 0) ==
>>> -1) {
>>>             msg->sms.account = account ? octstr_duplicate(account) :
>>> NULL;
>>>         } else {
>>> -           returnerror = octstr_create("Account field misformed,
>>> rejected");
>>> +           returnerror = octstr_create("Account field misformed or
>>> too long, rejected")
>>>             goto field_error;
>>>         }
>>>      }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>