Just to make sure I understand this correctly, when you mean "corba
binding", you mean another transport, just like HTTP or JMS, correct?
Thanks,
Glen
Am Freitag, den 30.11.2007, 16:27 -0500 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
> I just want to go on record as saying I COMPLETELY support this and think
> the CXF parts of this makes a lot of sense for the CXF project. I've
> always felt the binding parts of Yoko should have been done in CXF to
> start off with.
>
> For those that aren't familliar with it, the yoko ws binding stuff
> described in the proposal provides some tooling and a corba binding for
> CXF. It allows a CXF client (like a JAX-WS/JAXB client, but should
> work with the other frontends) to talk to CORBA servers or for a CXF
> server to be exposed as a CORBA server so other CORBA apps can talk to
> it.
>
>
> Anyway, Matt wants a vote to accept the proposal or not, but I'd like to
> leave this open for discussion for a couple days first as I'd like to
> hear others thoughts about it.
>
> Dan
