It would probably be a good idea to reorder the fields in the maven.mdo
file inside the maven-model project, to reflect the preferred style.
This should have the effect of reordering the generated reference
documentation and will also affect the ordering achieved when a POM is
written programmatically using the xpp3 writer (I think).
-john
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Vincent Siveton schrieb:
>
>> I propose to improve [1] to add a code style for our pom files.
>
> +1 for some convention (which is documented as such).
>
>> I see the following in this order.
>
> Considering other POMs like parent POMs and Mojo, your proposal should
> finally cover all POM elements (e.g. <packaging>, <url>, <licenses>,
> <developers> etc.).
>
> Whatever we agree upon, we might want to update the Maven Model
> Reference [0], too. I guess that was the ordering Dennis has chosen.
>
> If not already written down, the indentation style (2 spaces) should
> be mentioned, too.
>
>> <project>
>> ...
>> </project>
>
> I find your proposed ordering more intuitive than the current Model Ref.
>
>
> Benjamin
>
>
> [0]
http://maven.apache.org/ref/current/maven-model/maven.html>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
>
--
John Casey
Developer, PMC Member - Apache Maven (
http://maven.apache.org)
Blog:
http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp/---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
