Vincent Siveton wrote:
> IMHO devs should be after licenses, since they describe more a project
> than a build.
> [...]
> same reasoning for ML.
> [...]
> I propose to put dependencyManagement before dependencies to improve
> the readingness.
All fine with me. Also taking into account Paul Benedict's suggestion
about the <properties> which makes sense to me, I believe our current
sketch is
<modelVersion/>
<parent/>
<groupId/>
<artifactId/>
<version/>
<packaging/>
<name/>
<description/>
<url/>
<inceptionYear/>
<organization/>
<licenses/>
<developers/>
<contributors/>
<mailingLists/>
<prerequisites/>
<modules/>
<scm/>
<issueManagement/>
<ciManagement/>
<distributionManagement/>
<properties/>
<dependencyManagement/>
<dependencies/>
<repositories/>
<pluginRepositories/>
<build/>
<reporting/>
<profiles/>
Benjamin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
