James Warden wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering:
>
> is there an option to qjackctl so that we have only one running
> instance ?
>
> something like:
>
> qjackctl --single
>
> So next time I start it up, it will check whether there's already a
> running instance and just produce a message saying that one instance
> is already running (of course, the process state shall be examined in
> order to determine that the running qjackctl instance is a sound
> process).
>
> Moreover, there seems to be a side-effect to the fact that you can
> run multiple instances of qjackctl. While it may be fine in some
> contexts, if you close one of them, you bring down all the others.
>
unless you're using a pretty old and obsolete version (qjackctl < 0.3.3)
you can only have one single instance running at anyone time (this
applies to linux x11 only).
if you start qjackctl when one is instance is already running it just
quits and does nothing besides commanding the currently running qjackctl
instance to start jackd immediately *iif* not already active at the time.
there's a workaround however: setting distinct JACK_DEFAULT_SERVER
environment variable lets you have multiple qjackctl instances alright,
each commanding its own jackd server.
wrt. one instance bringing all others down might be a concern: check
whether you're not issuing a `killall jackd` on shutdown (see
setup/options/scripting) ...
cheers
--
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rncbc@...
_______________________________________________
Jack-Devel mailing list
Jack-Devel@...
http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org