On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 13:50 -0700, Julie S wrote:
> > What's happened is that I've only
> > committed the new files this time. I
> > didn't mean to. I understood that svn would recommit my
> > changes to
> > existing files.
> I usually just list all of the files I want to commit.
>
> so if I was in trunk/rosegarden/src
>
> svn commit gui/dialogs/file.cpp gui/editors/file2.cpp
>
> I'm certain svn is automated in that respect and I don't have to do that. But I've had good luck that way.
Seems likely that would have worked (specifying the files that I wanted to commit - my local svn thought those were up-to-date because I'd already committed them).
I'll remember that next time ... not that there'll be a next time since
they've now solved the spam bug that caused all this in the first place.
> If you just have a few changes to commit to get the last one working then just send those. Yeah, it will still be in the log, but that is okay as long as the latest rev works.
The clean build has completed OK. It's a little behind where I was last
night but that's no big deal, at least it builds.
I'll commit these now ... deep breath ...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize
details at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
Rosegarden-devel@... - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
