> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Jonny Bradley <jonny@...> wrote:
>> +1, but will we get the extra volunteer time to do this? Seems to me we already have more to do than we have people to do it, including myself (e.g. see QT voting on 6.7)
> This is the important question!
> You will notice that it would be security fixes only, so no extra work for QT.
Yes saw that, but there is some overlap :)
> 18 months of security fixes is perhaps 4-6 patches, and thus 4-6
> releases. If it's the same patch for Tiki14 than Tiki9LTS, then, it's
> not a lot of work. If the code has diverged enough that a different
> patch is needed, this is indeed additional work. But this is small
> potatoes compared to what the QT has been doing
> (tracking/voting/verifying/merging hundreds and hundreds of commits)
Indeed, shortening (somehow) the LTS but having XLTS sounds good (like t-shirt sizes!)