|
»
»
« Return to Thread: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.4 Quality
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.4 Quality
by Philip Luppens
::
Rate this Message:
Can a problem in a dependency hold back a GA ? I'm talking about
WW-1615 [1] (OGNL race condition). The bugfix is trivial, but we need
a new release for that. Patrick should have set up Jesse by now (its
new maintainer), so we can expect an official bugfix release rather
soon.
I guess I have some troubles with pushing a GA if such an important
dependency is having a known bug. We're already aware of S2 being
slower than S1, let's not kill whatever performance we have left with
a race condition, even if it's caused by a dependency rather than the
actual framework.
Of course, if this has nothing to do with it, then just disregard this message.
Cheers,
Phil
[1] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1615
On 1/30/07, Don Brown <mrdon@...> wrote:
> +1 for GA. I've been pretty happy with this build and while there are
> certainly things to improve (aren't there always?), I don't see anything
> major that should prevent production applications from being built upon it.
>
> Even if the final result is beta, will this release finally be put into
> the public maven repository?
>
> Don
>
> Ted Husted wrote:
> > Since the Struts 2.0.4 build is essentially the 2.0.3 build with Maven
> > fixes, I thought we might as well start the vote. If after three days
> > anyone needs more time, or we don't have a quorum, then we can just
> > leave the vote open for as long as it takes.
> >
> > Release notes:
> > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-204.html
> > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-203.html
> >
> > Distribution:
> > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.4/
> >
> > Maven 2 staging repository:
> > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.4/m2-staging-repository/
> >
> > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> > with a vote as to its quality:
> >
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >
> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> >
> > Please remember that a binding +1 for GA implies that you intend to
> > support the release by applying patches and responding to posts to the
> > user and dev lists.
> >
> > Unless we decide otherwise, a beta vote implies that we will announce
> > the build to the user list, to encourage wider testing.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>
>
--
iDTV System Engineer
"Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a
violent psychopath who knows where you live." - John F. Woods
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
WW-1615 [1] (OGNL race condition). The bugfix is trivial, but we need
a new release for that. Patrick should have set up Jesse by now (its
new maintainer), so we can expect an official bugfix release rather
soon.
I guess I have some troubles with pushing a GA if such an important
dependency is having a known bug. We're already aware of S2 being
slower than S1, let's not kill whatever performance we have left with
a race condition, even if it's caused by a dependency rather than the
actual framework.
Of course, if this has nothing to do with it, then just disregard this message.
Cheers,
Phil
[1] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1615
On 1/30/07, Don Brown <mrdon@...> wrote:
> +1 for GA. I've been pretty happy with this build and while there are
> certainly things to improve (aren't there always?), I don't see anything
> major that should prevent production applications from being built upon it.
>
> Even if the final result is beta, will this release finally be put into
> the public maven repository?
>
> Don
>
> Ted Husted wrote:
> > Since the Struts 2.0.4 build is essentially the 2.0.3 build with Maven
> > fixes, I thought we might as well start the vote. If after three days
> > anyone needs more time, or we don't have a quorum, then we can just
> > leave the vote open for as long as it takes.
> >
> > Release notes:
> > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-204.html
> > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-203.html
> >
> > Distribution:
> > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.4/
> >
> > Maven 2 staging repository:
> > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.4/m2-staging-repository/
> >
> > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> > with a vote as to its quality:
> >
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >
> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> >
> > Please remember that a binding +1 for GA implies that you intend to
> > support the release by applying patches and responding to posts to the
> > user and dev lists.
> >
> > Unless we decide otherwise, a beta vote implies that we will announce
> > the build to the user list, to encourage wider testing.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>
>
--
iDTV System Engineer
"Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a
violent psychopath who knows where you live." - John F. Woods
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
« Return to Thread: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.4 Quality
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
