On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:54:17 +0200, Jonas Sicking <
jonas@...> wrote:
> This is definitely a good question, one that I'd like to see addressed
> too.
>
> I think that if the spec remains as is Firefox would likely fire events
> that implements both the ProgressEvent interface and the LSProgressEvent
> interface, but encourage people to use the ProgressEvent interface.
> Possibly even by putting a message in the error console when the old
> interface properties are accessed.
If we want a different interface I think the progress events specification
should be changed. XMLHttpRequest Level 2 simply uses whatever Progress
Events 1.0 defines at this point and I'd like to keep it that way.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<
http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<
http://www.opera.com/>
