Steven Watanabe wrote:
> AMDG
>
> Simonson, Lucanus J wrote:
>> I use long long and long double in the configuration of my integer
>> arithmetic traits. I'd like to guard those usages with boost macros
>> to allow the code to compile on platforms that don't support long
>> long and long double (replace with long and double respectively) but
>> I can only find a BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG macro (which is apparently not
>> documented) and not a corresponding BOOST_HAS_LONG_DOUBLE. Is there
>> some other macro I can use to detect BOOST_HAS_LONG_DOUBLE or a
>> typedef I can use that is already set to long double if available
>> and double otherwise?
>>
>
> long double is standard C++. long long is only the
> the new standard.
>
> You might also consider using boost::int64_t from
> boost/cstdint.hpp guarded by BOOST_NO_INT64_T
>
> msvc has 64 bit ints, but doesn't call them long long.
>
> In Christ,
> Steven Watanabe
>
Yes, I realized that long double must be standard after grepping the boost codebase and seeing it used everywhere. If we searched the archive we'd probably find I asked this same question in the past. I might be a slow learner. My code with long long compiles in MSVC, does is compile to a 32 bit int? Specifying int64_t would make sense if my integer coordinate traits were in terms of int32_t, but they are in terms of int. Perhaps I should change that as well.
Thanks,
Luke
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
