Re: [future] Early draft of wait for multiple futures interface

Johan Torp <johan.torp@...> writes:

> After thinking more carefully on the problem I've realized it is
> implementable using condition variables. Here is a revised proposal, which -
> for now - excludes barriers.

Given wait_for_any and wait_for_all (see my latest revision), I don't
think we need these more complex composite classes in many cases, and
where we do they might be better implemented specifically for the case
at hand.

Anthony
--
Anthony Williams            | Just Software Solutions Ltd
Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk
Registered in England, Company Number 5478976.
Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost