On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Ross Mason <
themuleman@...> wrote:
I prefer 2). Down the line we may want to index these entries and report on dependencies.
btw the Query: select artifact where jar.manifest.entires in ('org.mule.container.MuleContainerContext') looks a little odd. would it be better to introduce a 'contains' keyword?
'contains' is one of the things we raised with Dan already. Actually, some more improvements are welcome, but having a good query parser is a prerequisite for major rework. JParsec stepped into the picture, though I don't know if the initial evaluation was going well enough (Dan needs to step in).
Andrew
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MuleForge Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to
muleforgedev@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
muleforgedev-unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/muleforgedev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---