Andrew Perepelytsya wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Ross Mason <
themuleman@...
> <mailto:
themuleman@...>> wrote:
>
> I prefer 2). Down the line we may want to index these entries and
> report on dependencies.
>
> btw the Query: select artifact where jar.manifest.entires in
> ('org.mule.container.MuleContainerContext') looks a little odd.
> would it be better to introduce a 'contains' keyword?
>
>
> 'contains' is one of the things we raised with Dan already. Actually,
> some more improvements are welcome, but having a good query parser is
> a prerequisite for major rework. JParsec stepped into the picture,
> though I don't know if the initial evaluation was going well enough
> (Dan needs to step in).
>
> Andrew
I like contains better as well.
I started the JParsec work, but am too friggin clueless about parsers.
I'll try to spend some more time with it this week.
- Dan
--
Dan Diephouse
MuleSource
http://mulesource.com |
http://netzooid.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://admin.muleforge.org/manage_email--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MuleForge Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to
muleforgedev@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
muleforgedev-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/muleforgedev?hl=en-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
