|
»
»
»
Re: [jira] Commented: (BUILDR-166) Upgrade to use RSpec 1.1.9
|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
|
|
|
Re: [jira] Commented: (BUILDR-166) Upgrade to use RSpec 1.1.9
by lacton
::
Rate this Message:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Assaf Arkin <arkin@...> wrote:
>> It looks like there is something wrong with the 1.1.9 gem. I am getting the following error message. >> >> ERROR: Error installing rspec: >> rspec requires spicycode-rcov (>= 0.8.1.3) > > This is said to be fixed in the latest and greatest RSpec: > > === Version 1.1.11 / 2008-10-24 > > * 1 major enhancement > > * eliminate ALL gem dependencies (as they were causing trouble for > people on different platforms/environment > > > Can you test with 1.1.11 to see if this was solved? Yes. It was solved. I installed RSpec 1.1.11 without any problem. Still, I run into another issue. Buildr::TarTask - should invoke and archive file tasks (ERROR - 1) Buildr::TarTask gzipped - should invoke and archive file tasks (ERROR - 2) Buildr::ZipTask - should invoke and archive file tasks (ERROR - 3) 1) NoMethodError in 'Buildr::TarTask should invoke and archive file tasks' undefined method `each_pair' for "included":String Lacton > Assaf > >> >> >>> Upgrade to use RSpec 1.1.9 >>> -------------------------- >>> >>> Key: BUILDR-166 >>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-166 >>> Project: Buildr >>> Issue Type: Improvement >>> Reporter: Assaf Arkin >>> Fix For: 1.3.4 >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> - >> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. >> >> > |
|
|
Re: [jira] Commented: (BUILDR-166) Upgrade to use RSpec 1.1.9
by lacton
::
Rate this Message:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:12 PM, lacton <lacton@...> wrote:
>> Can you test with 1.1.11 to see if this was solved? > > Yes. It was solved. I installed RSpec 1.1.11 without any problem. > > Still, I run into another issue. Issue fixed on trunk. I'm ready for RSpec 1.1.11. :-) Lacton > Lacton > >> Assaf >> >>> >>> >>>> Upgrade to use RSpec 1.1.9 >>>> -------------------------- >>>> >>>> Key: BUILDR-166 >>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-166 >>>> Project: Buildr >>>> Issue Type: Improvement >>>> Reporter: Assaf Arkin >>>> Fix For: 1.3.4 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >>> - >>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. >>> >>> >> > |
|
|
Re: [jira] Commented: (BUILDR-166) Upgrade to use RSpec 1.1.9
by Assaf Arkin
::
Rate this Message:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:12 PM, lacton <lacton@...> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Assaf Arkin <arkin@...> wrote: >>> It looks like there is something wrong with the 1.1.9 gem. I am getting the following error message. >>> >>> ERROR: Error installing rspec: >>> rspec requires spicycode-rcov (>= 0.8.1.3) >> >> This is said to be fixed in the latest and greatest RSpec: >> >> === Version 1.1.11 / 2008-10-24 >> >> * 1 major enhancement >> >> * eliminate ALL gem dependencies (as they were causing trouble for >> people on different platforms/environment >> >> >> Can you test with 1.1.11 to see if this was solved? > > Yes. It was solved. I installed RSpec 1.1.11 without any problem. > > Still, I run into another issue. > > Buildr::TarTask > - should invoke and archive file tasks (ERROR - 1) > > Buildr::TarTask gzipped > - should invoke and archive file tasks (ERROR - 2) > > Buildr::ZipTask > - should invoke and archive file tasks (ERROR - 3) > > 1) > NoMethodError in 'Buildr::TarTask should invoke and archive file tasks' > undefined method `each_pair' for "included":String I see you beat me to the fix :-) Assaf > > Lacton > >> Assaf >> >>> >>> >>>> Upgrade to use RSpec 1.1.9 >>>> -------------------------- >>>> >>>> Key: BUILDR-166 >>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-166 >>>> Project: Buildr >>>> Issue Type: Improvement >>>> Reporter: Assaf Arkin >>>> Fix For: 1.3.4 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >>> - >>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. >>> >>> >> > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
