« Return to Thread: [mb-style] Lets put GettingRidOfFeaturingArtistStyle to the vote.
Re: [mb-style] Lets put GettingRidOfFeaturingArtistSty
by Gecks
::
Rate this Message:
i'd prefer to keep it, but to only use it when that's how it actually
appears on the tracklisting. a lot of 'bad' edits have been done under the
current guideline - eg putting (feat. x) on stuff like the chemical brothers
use of famous guest vocalists on a lot of tracks - in my experience they
don't credit them beyond a mention in the liner, not on the tracklisting. so
i don't think the SG5 should be applied.
i want the guidelines to organise data found on tracklistings, not
add/remove stuff (within reason). not by default, anyway. once AR info is
transferred to tags, this could all be user preferences in the tagger (eg
you could have 'SomeDudes - FunkyShit (feat. Dave [Bass], Steve [Kazoo])' or
whatever)
not got round to adding this as an alternative on the wiki yet, though.
Cheers,
Chris B
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rod Begbie" <rodbegbie@...>
To: "MusicBrainz style discussion" <musicbrainz-style@...>
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 11:01 PM
Subject: [mb-style] Lets put GettingRidOfFeaturingArtistStyle to the vote.
> OK folks, it's been a couple of weeks since anyone has added anything
> to http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/GettingRidOfFeaturingArtistStyle
>
> Because I'm fed up with 'mo' dicking around with my moderations, I'd
> like to try putting this to a (completely non-binding) vote, using the
> Apache Lazy Concensus rules.
>
> Reply to this thread, and simply say +1 if you agree, -1 if you
> disagree, or a number in between if you're opinion is in between (see
> bottom of this mail for examples). Also say if you're a member of the
> Style Council, or just a mailinglist participant. Next Saturday
> (12th), I'll tot-up the votes.
>
> PROPOSAL: We change FeaturingArtistStyle to read: "When two or more
> artists collaborate on a track or release, file the track/release
> under the primary artist, and then add "performed on" relationships to
> the secondary artists. If no artist can be considered secondary,
> create a new artist in the form 'Artist 1 & Artist 2' and add
> "collaborated on" relationships to the artists."
>
> I vote +1, but I'm not a Style Council member.
>
> Rod.
>
> -----
> Expressing Votes: +1, 0, -1, and Fractions
>
> The voting process in Apache may seem more than a little weird if
> you've never encountered it before. Votes are represented as numbers
> between -1 and +1, with '-1' meaning 'no' and '+1' meaning 'yes.'
>
> The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the voting
> individual feels. Here are some examples of fractional votes and ways
> in which they might be intended and interpreted:
>
> * +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okey with this.'
> * -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.'
> * -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational
> justification for my feelings.'
> * ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!'
> * -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in
> the way if everyone else wants to go ahead with it.'
> * +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have
> time/the skills necessary to help out.'
>
> -- http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> --
> :: Rod Begbie :: http://groovymother.com/ ::
>
> _______________________________________________
> Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> Musicbrainz-style@...
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
>
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@...
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
appears on the tracklisting. a lot of 'bad' edits have been done under the
current guideline - eg putting (feat. x) on stuff like the chemical brothers
use of famous guest vocalists on a lot of tracks - in my experience they
don't credit them beyond a mention in the liner, not on the tracklisting. so
i don't think the SG5 should be applied.
i want the guidelines to organise data found on tracklistings, not
add/remove stuff (within reason). not by default, anyway. once AR info is
transferred to tags, this could all be user preferences in the tagger (eg
you could have 'SomeDudes - FunkyShit (feat. Dave [Bass], Steve [Kazoo])' or
whatever)
not got round to adding this as an alternative on the wiki yet, though.
Cheers,
Chris B
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rod Begbie" <rodbegbie@...>
To: "MusicBrainz style discussion" <musicbrainz-style@...>
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 11:01 PM
Subject: [mb-style] Lets put GettingRidOfFeaturingArtistStyle to the vote.
> OK folks, it's been a couple of weeks since anyone has added anything
> to http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/GettingRidOfFeaturingArtistStyle
>
> Because I'm fed up with 'mo' dicking around with my moderations, I'd
> like to try putting this to a (completely non-binding) vote, using the
> Apache Lazy Concensus rules.
>
> Reply to this thread, and simply say +1 if you agree, -1 if you
> disagree, or a number in between if you're opinion is in between (see
> bottom of this mail for examples). Also say if you're a member of the
> Style Council, or just a mailinglist participant. Next Saturday
> (12th), I'll tot-up the votes.
>
> PROPOSAL: We change FeaturingArtistStyle to read: "When two or more
> artists collaborate on a track or release, file the track/release
> under the primary artist, and then add "performed on" relationships to
> the secondary artists. If no artist can be considered secondary,
> create a new artist in the form 'Artist 1 & Artist 2' and add
> "collaborated on" relationships to the artists."
>
> I vote +1, but I'm not a Style Council member.
>
> Rod.
>
> -----
> Expressing Votes: +1, 0, -1, and Fractions
>
> The voting process in Apache may seem more than a little weird if
> you've never encountered it before. Votes are represented as numbers
> between -1 and +1, with '-1' meaning 'no' and '+1' meaning 'yes.'
>
> The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the voting
> individual feels. Here are some examples of fractional votes and ways
> in which they might be intended and interpreted:
>
> * +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okey with this.'
> * -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.'
> * -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational
> justification for my feelings.'
> * ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!'
> * -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in
> the way if everyone else wants to go ahead with it.'
> * +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have
> time/the skills necessary to help out.'
>
> -- http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> --
> :: Rod Begbie :: http://groovymother.com/ ::
>
> _______________________________________________
> Musicbrainz-style mailing list
> Musicbrainz-style@...
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
>
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@...
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
« Return to Thread: [mb-style] Lets put GettingRidOfFeaturingArtistStyle to the vote.
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
