Re: [move semantics] Do we have any plan for move semantics emulation?

Ion Gaztañaga wrote:
>    The rvalue reference is likely to be accepted for the next standard
> and the standard library is also likely to be modified to implement move
> semantics. Googling around, the only thing I've found related to Boost
> and move semantics is Jonathan Turkanis' Boost Move Ptr
> (http://www.kangaroologic.com/move_ptr/).
There's also a great utility from Andrei Aleksandrescu:
http://www.ddj.com/dept/cpp/184403855

I used it in my STL-compatible container library with great results.

Also, there's NTL
(http://upp.sourceforge.net/srcdoc$Core$Tutorial$en-us.html) which uses
'move constructors' by default.

--
With respect,
             Alex Besogonov (cyberax@...)

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost