Ion Gaztañaga <
igaztanaga@...> writes:
>> I've been intending to get this into Boost:
>
> Looks nice. Any intention to request a review?
Yeah, sorta. I was planning on doing that after I wrote some code
that uses it in anger.
> Inheritance approach (deriving from moveable) is a good idea, but
> Boost.Move code wouldn't be compatible with the standard C++0x syntax.
> Is inheritance necessary to get the desired rvalue/lvalue dispatching or
> is just a convenience?
IIRC, it's the latter. It's been a while since I worked on this code,
though. Oh, the comment says:
// CRTP base class for conveniently making movable types. You don't
// have to use this to make a type movable (if, for example, you don't
// want the MI non-EBO penalty); you just need to provide the
// conversion to move_from<Derived> yourself in that case.
template <class Derived>
struct movable
> If you get a compiler with rvalue references (let's hope gcc gets
> this soon), and you have a library with Boost.Move it would be nice
> just to recompile. Just my 2 cents. Anyway, nice to know you are
> working on it.
I haven't been, really. The coding/testing work is done, as far as
I'm concerned. It needs docs, of course.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
