Re: [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed[3787] Default PCSC provider is libpcsclite.so. 1 instead of libpcsclite.so
|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
|
|
|
Re: [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed[3787] Default PCSC provider is libpcsclite.so. 1 instead of libpcsclite.so
by Ludovic Rousseau
::
Rate this Message:
2009/10/23 Alon Bar-Lev <alon.barlev@...>:
> This is invalid fix. Please justify. Read http://bugs.debian.org/511344 first. > The default should be the libpcsclite.so. > If you want something else use --with-pcsc-provider configure > parameter during packaging. > Please revert and notify debian to modify their packaging. > Thanks. > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:12 PM, <webmaster@...> wrote: >> Revision: 3787 >> Author: ludovic.rousseau >> Date: 2009-10-23 12:12:40 +0000 (Fri, 23 Oct 2009) >> >> Log Message: >> ----------- >> Default PCSC provider is libpcsclite.so.1 instead of libpcsclite.so >> >> See Debian bug #511344 >> >> Modified Paths: >> -------------- >> trunk/configure.ac >> >> Modified: trunk/configure.ac >> =================================================================== >> --- trunk/configure.ac 2009-10-22 18:28:25 UTC (rev 3786) >> +++ trunk/configure.ac 2009-10-23 12:12:40 UTC (rev 3787) >> @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ >> DEFAULT_PCSC_PROVIDER="winscard.dll" >> ;; >> *) >> - DEFAULT_PCSC_PROVIDER="/usr/lib${libdir##*/lib}/libpcsclite.so" >> + DEFAULT_PCSC_PROVIDER="/usr/lib${libdir##*/lib}/libpcsclite.so.1" >> ;; >> esac >> else >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> opensc-commits mailing list >> opensc-commits@... >> http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-commits >> > -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@... http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel |
|
|
Re: [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed[3787] Default PCSC provider is libpcsclite.so. 1 instead of libpcsclite.so
by Alon Bar-Lev
::
Rate this Message:
I did.
As I wrote, if upstream have parameter to customize and provide whatever needed downstream no change is required upstream. On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Ludovic Rousseau <ludovic.rousseau@...> wrote: > 2009/10/23 Alon Bar-Lev <alon.barlev@...>: >> This is invalid fix. > > Please justify. > > Read http://bugs.debian.org/511344 first. > >> The default should be the libpcsclite.so. >> If you want something else use --with-pcsc-provider configure >> parameter during packaging. >> Please revert and notify debian to modify their packaging. >> Thanks. >> >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:12 PM, <webmaster@...> wrote: >>> Revision: 3787 >>> Author: ludovic.rousseau >>> Date: 2009-10-23 12:12:40 +0000 (Fri, 23 Oct 2009) >>> >>> Log Message: >>> ----------- >>> Default PCSC provider is libpcsclite.so.1 instead of libpcsclite.so >>> >>> See Debian bug #511344 >>> >>> Modified Paths: >>> -------------- >>> trunk/configure.ac >>> >>> Modified: trunk/configure.ac >>> =================================================================== >>> --- trunk/configure.ac 2009-10-22 18:28:25 UTC (rev 3786) >>> +++ trunk/configure.ac 2009-10-23 12:12:40 UTC (rev 3787) >>> @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ >>> DEFAULT_PCSC_PROVIDER="winscard.dll" >>> ;; >>> *) >>> - DEFAULT_PCSC_PROVIDER="/usr/lib${libdir##*/lib}/libpcsclite.so" >>> + DEFAULT_PCSC_PROVIDER="/usr/lib${libdir##*/lib}/libpcsclite.so.1" >>> ;; >>> esac >>> else >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensc-commits mailing list >>> opensc-commits@... >>> http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-commits >>> >> > > > > -- > Dr. Ludovic Rousseau > opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@... http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel |
|
|
Re: [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed[3787] Default PCSC provider is libpcsclite.so. 1 instead of libpcsclite.so
by Andreas Jellinghaus-2
::
Rate this Message:
Am Samstag 24 Oktober 2009 06:33:36 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
> I did. > As I wrote, if upstream have parameter to customize and provide > whatever needed downstream no change is required upstream. true, we don't need to change our code if people can customize these things. but why would we want a a default that will cause problems on typical installations? I think that is a bad idea, opensc should not try to use pcsc via a name that is only resolved if the development package is installed. Thus I think the change should be kept, and it is actually an improvement. also I don't want to role -rc3 for an issue like that - people can fix it with configure flags, if they prefer "libpcsclite.so" over "libpcsclite.so.1" for some reason. but maybe I missed something, and there is a drawback to using that name, that I didn't see? Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@... http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
