« Return to Thread: [rvm-core] RVM-767

Re: [rvm-core] RVM-767

by Tony Hosking :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

How about "quietly" and "noisily"? :-)

Or. Perhaps more obviously: "notifyingGC", "ignoringGC".

Any other votes.

On 4 Apr 2009, at 10:05, Filip Pizlo wrote:

> The native thread locking classes use terms like "nicely" and
> "dangerously" to denote whether or not the GC is notified when the
> given method causes the thread to block.  I cannot think of better
> terms.  On the other hand, I have no strong attachment to the current
> naming scheme.  Various people have spoken up about this, but I've
> lost track of what naming people wanted.
>
> So.  If you think that the current naming scheme is bad, what would
> you prefer?  If I don't hear any opinions, I'll keep it as-is.
>
> -F
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Jikesrvm-core mailing list
> Jikesrvm-core@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jikesrvm-core


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Jikesrvm-core mailing list
Jikesrvm-core@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jikesrvm-core

 « Return to Thread: [rvm-core] RVM-767