« Return to Thread: [scala] Collections performance

Re: [scala] Collections performance

by David MacIver :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Viktor Klang <viktor.klang@...> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:20 PM, David Pollak <dpp@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Viktor Klang wrote:
>>>
>>> We just make sure our stuff is as open as the stuff we are copying.
>>>
>>> Once again, copyright violation is theft.  It's no different than
>>> stealing a car.  Being part of the FOSS community means respecting that.
>>
>> With all respect, copyright violation is copyright violation, theft is
>> theft.
>> Both are illegal, but don't compare apples to nuts.
>>
>> Copying an MP3 from a friend may be copyright violation, but it may not be
>> theft.
>>
>> In this case, taking someone else's code (Property) and putting it in your
>> code in violation of license terms (without their permission), is theft.
>> See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theft
>
> Theft implies that something is moved from one place to another. The act of
> Copying doesn't move anything.

Take it to scala-debate please.

 « Return to Thread: [scala] Collections performance