Thanks for the response. Unfortunately, that expression does not denote a type. And the type of the thing it does denote is not what is required.
scala> new Array[Char](140)
res20: Array[Char] = Array(, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ...
scala>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jorge Ortiz
<jorge.ortiz@...> wrote:
new Array[Char](140) ?
--jOn Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Balthazar Crowley
<balthazar.crowley@...> wrote:
Viktor,
Since this is only for pedagogical purposes, either will do. The example might be familiar to many: Char arrays limited to 140 elements.
Regards,
BalthazarOn Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Viktor Klang
<viktor.klang@...> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Balthazar Crowley
<balthazar.crowley@...> wrote:
All,
Does Scala have a fixed array type?
As opposed to broken ones?
Jokes aside, are you talking about stack-allocated fixed arrays or only that they are fixed as in compile-time size bounded?
Regards,
Balthazar
--
Balthazar Crowley
Resident Magician
DSLver.com
--
Viktor Klang
Scala Loudmouth
--
Balthazar Crowley
Resident Magician
DSLver.com
--
Balthazar Crowley
Resident Magician
DSLver.com
