On 1/17/06, Anuradha Ratnaweera <
gnu.slash.linux@...> wrote:
> After going through apt-cacher and apt-proxy, i came to believe that
> apt-cacher is a better solution, especially considering it's
> maintained (sarge has 0.9, etch has 1.1 and sid has 1.4). If nobody
> has objectives, I'll go forth and make apt-cacher the recommended way
> of caching packages.
I think we'd better to move with apt-cacher. we (sahana core team)
have very bad experience with apt-proxy.
Regards!
Pradeeper
--
Don't live to geek; geek to live
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642_______________________________________________
taprobane-general mailing list
taprobane-general@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/taprobane-general
