On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 09:49 +0200, Daniel Gollub wrote:
> On Thursday 09 April 2009 09:30:16 am Bjoern Ricks wrote:
> > >> Make OSyncCapabilities and the use of Merger/Demerge format independent
> > >>
http://www.opensync.org/ticket/1084> > >>
> > >> Still need to finish my "design" draft. As soon this is ready i'll drop
> > >> a new mail about this. I already started to make some notes in the
> > >> wiki... but it's incomplete. (This based on the previous discussion
> > >> regarding "native capabilities", alternative to xmlforamt and stuff like
> > >> that ..)
> > >
> > > This is still open ... i plan to invest today my time on that.
> >
> > The discussion is still ongoing. Daniel could you write a short mail
> > about the current status and your planning?
>
> Still waiting for some comments on [RFC] Plugin specifc capabilities II
>
>
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.misc.opensync.devel/3787/focus=3818>
> Patrick, any chance to review/read/think about this mail?
I have read it, but didn't have specific comments. I suppose conversion
could be implemented in several ways and you'll find out how well the
design works when actually implementing it in several plugins.
--
Bye, Patrick Ohly
--
Patrick.Ohly@...
http://www.estamos.de/------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com_______________________________________________
Opensync-devel mailing list
Opensync-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensync-devel
