Daniel Gollub wrote:
>
> Still waiting for some comments on [RFC] Plugin specifc capabilities II
>
>
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.misc.opensync.devel/3787/focus=3818>
>
Please also see
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.misc.opensync.devel/3819>>>> Separate static and dynamic parts of plugin/member configuration
>>>>
http://www.opensync.org/ticket/1013>>>>
>>>> I'm not quite sure if we still can do this without touching any API. If
>>>> so this is not blocking 0.39.
>>>>
>>> Still need to be clarified if this involves any API change. if not this
>>> is not blocking 0.39
>>>
>> I am not sure about this ticket and the current status. It was
>> originally created by Henrik. So Henrik could you write some sentences
>> about it?
>>
>
> Actually i planned to take care about this once the capabilities issue is
> fixed. IIRC Henrik is quite busy with other thing and doesn't have time right
> now taking care about this. Maybe we should open this for other takers?
>
>
I know very little of the internals of OpenSync, and I fear that I will
probably introduce more problems than solutions if I start playing with
this.
I have only limited time, and I think it is best spend on mozilla-sync
and the interface to OpenSync and SyncML
/Henrik
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com_______________________________________________
Opensync-devel mailing list
Opensync-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensync-devel
