« Return to Thread: [vote] Version for pending release

Re: [vote] Version for pending release

by jvanzyl :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

+1 for #1

On 29-Aug-08, at 9:02 AM, John Casey wrote:

> Okay,
>
> Let's put it to a vote. We have two options:
>
> 1. Release the current release candidate as milestone 1 of the 2.1.0  
> codeline. The version for this release would be 2.1.0-M1.
>
> The advantage of this approach is that it keeps is (relatively)  
> focused on only three simultaneous codebases, not four. It provides  
> a stable foundation for building out a small set of new features for  
> a final GA release of 2.1.0. This release will have no new features,  
> and its only goal is backward compatibility with the maximum  
> stability possible. To me, this isn't enough to distinguish it from  
> 2.0.x. However, the implementation details are such that it deserves  
> to be separate.
>
> The disadvantage is that a -M1 release may not attract as many  
> users, and the performance/stability gains may not be compelling  
> enough to overcome the psychological barrier of moving from 2.0.9 to  
> 2.1.0-M1.
>
> 2. Release the current release candidate as 2.1.0 GA.
>
> The advantage here is that the work we've put into stabilizing this  
> RC is probably more worth of a GA release, and by calling it 2.1.0  
> we can tell our users how solid we think it is. Additionally,  
> calling this 2.1.0 means that the only thing we could do for 2.1.1,  
> 2.1.2, etc. would be to fix any regressions that cropped up without  
> adding risk from new features.
>
> The major disadvantage is that it will mean that some of us are  
> adding new features to 2.2.0 (parent-versioning, reactor changes,  
> etc.) while others are trying to push out regression fixes on 2.0.x  
> and 2.1.x, while still others are introducing large-scale changes on  
> the 3.0.x branch. I'm personally not sure we can drive four parallel  
> codelines to release in a timely manner.
>
> So, let's vote. Just indicate whether you support #1 or #2.
>
> My vote is for #1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -john
>
> --
> John Casey
> Developer, PMC Member - Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
> Blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------

Simplex sigillum veri. (Simplicity is the seal of truth.)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...

 « Return to Thread: [vote] Version for pending release