I think it is more likely there will be integrated support with their
profiler.
Paul Batum wrote:
> I agree, this could easily work out to very good news. It would be
> awesome to get a fully integrated reflector experience in Visual
> Studio. I would be more than happy to pay money for that.
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Sebastien Lambla <
seb@...
> <mailto:
seb@...>> wrote:
>
> Reflector has never been open source, neither has testdriven.net
> <
http://testdriven.net>
>
> I wish them well and hope they'll provide a commercial version,
> for example
> letting you dynamically step through decompiled code. THat would
> be a real
> time saver when dealing with unavailable code...
>
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>
> From: "Gabriel Schenker" <
gnschenker@...
> <mailto:gnschenker%40gmail.com>>
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 1:28 PM
>
> To: <
altdotnet@... <mailto:altdotnet%40yahoogroups.com>>
> Subject: [altdotnet] .NET Reflector now belongs to Redgate
>
> > after years of development Lutz Roeder obviously abandons it's flag
> > ship an has given (sold?) it to Redgate.
> > Although Redgate has annouced to provide a free version also in the
> > future I fear that in the long run you will have to pay for the full
> > version of Reflector.
> > Do we have to say goodbye to another indispensable OSS tool?
> (see e.g.
> > what happened to NCover and Testdriven.Net)
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
