Ole Ersoy wrote:
> > * Getting to 100% tested takes less time if we
> > generate tests from a
> > model than if we write them by hand.
>
> Sure - getting methods that are 100% tested should
> take 0 time (For the person doing the coding).
Do you mean "it would be nice if 100% tested code took 0 time"? or that
"it should be possible today to have 100% tested code in 0 time"?
It seems to me the first is not possible and the second is obviously
false. What am I missing?
--
J. B. (Joe) Rainsberger ::
http://www.jbrains.caYour guide to software craftsmanship
JUnit Recipes: Practical Methods for Programmer Testing
2005 Gordon Pask Award for contribution Agile Software Practice