Re: 2.8 collections

> Oh, thanks for the clarification, I missed that the mismatch was only
> between put and add, not remove.
>
> Still, wouldn't an "add" be more intuitive (for Java programmers) than
> a put with inverted return value?
>
> Btw, reading this code (JavaConversions.scala):
>
>  case class JSetWrapper[A](underlying : ju.Set[A]) extends
> mutable.Set[A] with generic.MutableSetTemplate[A, JSetWrapper[A]] {
>   ...
>    override def put(elem: A): Boolean = underlying.add(elem)
>
> I would expect to see a negation there. Right? Or did I miss something again?
>