Re: 3.3.0 plans

> Warren Togami writes:
>> Justin Mason wrote:
>>> Quanah Gibson-Mount writes:
>>>> --On Friday, March 14, 2008 3:36 PM +0000 Justin Mason <jm@...>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ok, what bugs really need to be fixed for 3.3.0?  feel free to set
>>>>> Priority on bugs on the 3.3.0 milestone.  in my opinion this is the
>>>>> only real blocker:
>>>> <http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4416> please please
>>>> please. :)
>>> unfortunately, there's no patch there, and it appears that BerkeleyDB
>>> doesn't support upgrading of .db files anyway.  unlikely to get in,
>>> given that!
>> How are the 3.3.0 plans coming along?
>
> Hmm. things have been pretty quiet -- I think we're all a bit distracted
> by other, non-SpamAssassin-related stuff, unfortunately.
>
> I've been meaning to try to push it along, the big work items are:
>
>   - fixing the distribution process to work without rules in the dist
>     tarball (since we'll be moving to a model where with distribute
>     without rules and they're downloaded by the admin on install).
>
>   - generating automated daily scores with Daryl.  this is kind of complex
>     since it relies on having good rule-QA data coming in with the
>     "reuse=yes" flag set, and I'm not sure what our current status is
>     there.
>