|
»
« Return to Thread: 3484bis and privacy addresses
Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
by JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Brian,
I think by default privacy addresses (option B) should be selected.
It is up to applications that require "stable" addresses to force the
other way around, and a quick guess is that this kind of applications
already do it by means of selecting a DNS name that should typically have
already a global stable address.
Regards,
Jordi
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Brian Haberman <brian@...>
Responder a: <brian@...>
Fecha: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 03:33:48 -0400
Para: <ipv6@...>
Asunto: 3484bis and privacy addresses
>All,
> The chairs would like to get a sense of the working group on
>changing the current (defined 3484) model of preferring public addresses
>over privacy addresses during the address selection process. RFC 3484
>prefers public addresses with the ability (MAY) of an implementation to
>reverse the preference. The suggestion has been made to reverse that
>preference in 3484bis (prefer privacy addresses over public ones).
>Regardless, the document will allow implementers/users to reverse the
>default preference.
>
> Please state your preference for one of the following default
>options :
>
>A. Prefer public addresses over privacy addresses
>
>B. Prefer privacy addresses over public addresses
>
>Regards,
>Brian, Bob, & Ole
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>ipv6@...
>Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@...
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I think by default privacy addresses (option B) should be selected.
It is up to applications that require "stable" addresses to force the
other way around, and a quick guess is that this kind of applications
already do it by means of selecting a DNS name that should typically have
already a global stable address.
Regards,
Jordi
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Brian Haberman <brian@...>
Responder a: <brian@...>
Fecha: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 03:33:48 -0400
Para: <ipv6@...>
Asunto: 3484bis and privacy addresses
>All,
> The chairs would like to get a sense of the working group on
>changing the current (defined 3484) model of preferring public addresses
>over privacy addresses during the address selection process. RFC 3484
>prefers public addresses with the ability (MAY) of an implementation to
>reverse the preference. The suggestion has been made to reverse that
>preference in 3484bis (prefer privacy addresses over public ones).
>Regardless, the document will allow implementers/users to reverse the
>default preference.
>
> Please state your preference for one of the following default
>options :
>
>A. Prefer public addresses over privacy addresses
>
>B. Prefer privacy addresses over public addresses
>
>Regards,
>Brian, Bob, & Ole
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>ipv6@...
>Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@...
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
« Return to Thread: 3484bis and privacy addresses
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
