« Return to Thread: 4rd-U informal meeting - Tuesday 15:15 Room 204

Re: 4rd-U informal meeting - Tuesday 15:15 Room 204

by Simon Perreault-3 :: Rate this Message:

| View in Thread

On 03/28/12 09:22, Tetsuya Murakami wrote:
> In terms of CNP, CNP needs to be calculated every time if the packet
> is toward to outside of domain because the embedded IPv4 address
> could be different. So, I think there is no difference between CNP
> and recalculation of L4 checksum from the implementation point of
> view.

On the contrary, there is a big difference. The difference is that you
are only concerned with L3. L4 can change: UDP, TCP, ICMP, STCP, DCCP,
etc, etc, etc. You need a lot of code to handle all existing transport
protocols, and you still can't handle future protocols that people might
develop.

Checksum neutrality is a *big* advantage.

Simon
--
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@...
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

 « Return to Thread: 4rd-U informal meeting - Tuesday 15:15 Room 204