On 18-May-09, at 8:37 AM, Mark Shropshire wrote:
> Thanks for the instructions on this. You included the step of going
> to 5.0 first, then the latest 5.x. I always wondered if this was
> necessary.
AFAIK it shouldn't be; Earnie, can you explain why you did it that way?
> My guess was at least 100 hours to upgrade to 5.18, migrate to 6.12
The vast majority of that should be in the 5-6 migration; upgrading
from 5.5 to 5.18 should be pretty trivial, assuming the site was built
without too many core hacks.
--Andrew