Quoting Andrew Berry <
andrewberry@...>:
> On 18-May-09, at 8:37 AM, Mark Shropshire wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the instructions on this. You included the step of going
>> to 5.0 first, then the latest 5.x. I always wondered if this was
>> necessary.
>
> AFAIK it shouldn't be; Earnie, can you explain why you did it that way?
>
Because it ensures that all updates marked for 5.x are made since
those updates are not carried to 6.x.
>> My guess was at least 100 hours to upgrade to 5.18, migrate to 6.12
>
> The vast majority of that should be in the 5-6 migration; upgrading
> from 5.5 to 5.18 should be pretty trivial, assuming the site was
> built without too many core hacks.
>
It took me about 2 hours to do mine but all of the modules were 6.x ready.
--
Earnie
--
http://r-feed.com/ --
http://for-my-kids.com/--
http://www.4offer.biz/ --
http://give-me-an-offer.com/
