On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 15:39 +0200, Jens Mittag wrote:
> Ramon Bauza schrieb:
> > Please, I would like to have your comments on this in order to proceed with
> > the implementation.
>
> +1
>
> I totally agree with you. I would appreciate if this addition makes it
> into the main branch.
>
> However, I would prefer a different way of solving this issue:
> definition of channel spacing within WifiMode. I think this would help
> to ease the setup of a simulation scenario. Instead of changing
> attributes in several classes, you can simply set the wifi mode once
> (which stores all the information - I would also vote to include the MAC
> values which are dependent on the specific PHY). Every module which
> needs these parameters can then get the values from the WifiMode object
> associated to the packet. What do you think?
-1
Yes, it's hard to get all the MAC+PHY parameters right but I don't think
that this would really improve it. Instead, we should provide a set of
for-dummies configuration functions to do this right for each standard
but allow users to go and tweak them themselves if they feel inclined to
try weird combinations.
Mathieu
