Re: A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines

> From: Earwin Burrfoot <earwin@...>
> To: java-dev@...
> Sent: Monday, 6 July, 2009 23:01:52
> Subject: Re: A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines
>
> I'd say out of these libraries only Lucene and Sphinx are worth mentioning.
>
> There's also MG4J, which wasn't covered and has a nice algorithmic background.
> Anybody knows other interesting open-source search engines?
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 00:39, John Wangwrote:
> > Vik did a very nice job.
> > One thing the experiment did not mention is that Lucene handles incremental
> > updates, whereas many of the other "competitors" do not. So the indexing
> > performance comparison is not really fair.
> > -John
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/
> >>
> >> I imagine many of you already saw this -- Lucene does pretty well in
> >> this "shootout".
> >> The only area it tended to lag, it seems, is memory usage and speed in
> >> some cases.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@...
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@...
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (earwin@...)
> Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
> ICQ: 104465785
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@...