On May 7, 2008, at 1:28 PM, Dale King wrote:
> Any feedback on these issues? I submitted Jira issues on all 3.
>
> The threads not ending cleanly is a major problem with me trying to
> move one component of our system to Log4Cxx. I would at least like to
> get a patch for it (preferrably a released version). I've tried
> several things but have not found a complete solution and the fact
> that it behaves differently than the FileWatchdog thread is confusing.
> I'm willing to help out on it, but am interested in your thoughts on
> the threading issues since you wrote it.
>
I've committed several changes against these issues and closed them as
resolved. Obviously it would be good if you could confirm that they
address the issues that you encountered.
I spun off LOGCXX-282 as a separate issue to allow Thread::sleep() to
be woken up by a call to Thread::interrupt(). However, the required
added additional member variables to the Thread class which would make
the resulting library not binary compatible with log4cxx 0.10.0. I've
held off committing it until I get some other non-breaking changes
fixed, but I would appreciate your checking it using the patch file
attached to the bug report. After we get come feedback, we can decide
if you want to have a 0.10.1 or a 0.11.0 or both.
