« Return to Thread: AMF3 references

Re: AMF3 references

by Evert | Rooftop :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Thanks a lot! I'll reiterate my test cases, just wanted to know I'm not
crazy

Nick Joyce wrote:

> Hi Evert,
>
> Afaik, AMF3 references are cleared for all types (strings, classes &  
> objects) at the end of each 'context'. This includes the remoting  
> header (a gotcha for me) and each body, which is a really odd design  
> choice, because the whole idea of references is to cut down the bytes  
> sent down the wire ..
>
> Hope that helps sort your problem!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> On 24 Mar 2008, at 22:08, Evert | Rooftop wrote:
>
>  
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I'm running into some issues with SabreAMF regarding object and string
>> references..
>>
>> Way back I made a change to maintain the class definition/object
>> references across multiple bodies; because of a bug I encountered..
>> Now I'm looking at a bug report, which has the reverse problem.. but  
>> for
>> string references..
>>
>> So, the logical conclusion is that object and class references are
>> maintained across AMF3 bodies, but strings aren't...
>>
>> This, however, seems so weird though.. It made me wonder how you guys
>> deal with this...
>>
>> Are your object and class references maintained across bodies?
>>
>> Evert
>> _______________________________________________
>> PyAMF dev mailing list - dev@...
>> http://lists.pyamf.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>    
>
> _______________________________________________
> PyAMF dev mailing list - dev@...
> http://lists.pyamf.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>  


 « Return to Thread: AMF3 references