On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Marvin Humphrey <
marvin@...> wrote:
> Greets,
>
> As noted below, the AOO LICENSE and NOTICE files are in what seems to me to be
> an unusual configuration. I'm not planning on voting -1 because of it, but
> others may feel differently, and rather than make the AOO folks go through
> several release candidates down the road, it would be nice to hear objections
> now.
>
Actually, we're updating this per your advice.
See, for example:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/trunk/main/LICENSE?view=markup-Rob
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Rob Weir <
robweir@...> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Marvin Humphrey
>> <
marvin@...> wrote:
>
>>> I was a little surprised that the LICENSE file contained only the ALv2, and
>>> that NOTICE points at the websites for dependencies and their licensing.
>>> Ordinarily, I would expect to see entire verbatim licenses for all bundled
>>> dependencies in LICENSE.
>>>
>>
>> OK.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
general-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail:
general-help@...
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
general-help@...
